<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calvinism the Elect and Children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fruitoftheword.com/2009/04/05/calvinism-the-elect-and-children/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fruitoftheword.com/2009/04/05/calvinism-the-elect-and-children/</link>
	<description>A Christian Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:37:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas Liljestrom</title>
		<link>http://fruitoftheword.com/2009/04/05/calvinism-the-elect-and-children/comment-page-1/#comment-6638</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Liljestrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 14:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tishrei.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-6638</guid>
		<description>Hello Tishrei! I apologize for commenting once more on an old blog entry, but I&#039;ve had some more thoughts on the subject which I don&#039;t rightly know where else to post. 

It seems to me that the reason why Calvin was so persistent in pushing the doctrines of predestination and total depravity was that the Roman Catholic Church of that era had trivialized the problem of sin by turning forgiveness into a commodity which could be bought and sold, primarily through indulgence peddling. Calvin and the other Protestant reformers were rightfully upset with this state of affairs and I believe that he, through his teachings, wanted to put the issue of sin in its proper perspective by emphasizing in the strongest possible terms that sin is worthy of punishment, that forgiveness is not a right and that it comes only through God&#039;s grace. To invest one&#039;s hopes of salvation in such a corrupt and hypocritical organization as the late-medieval RCC was both futile and preposterous, and the reformers were extremely aware of this.

The mistake that many modern Calvinists make, in my opinion, is that they often fail to have this historical perspective in mind. That&#039;s why they often over-emphasize the doom-and-gloom aspect of the relationship between God and man, and fail to give the love, forgiveness and hope entailed in Christ&#039;s teachings the attention it deserves (and which human beings so often need to be reminded of).

I wonder if you could please direct me to any forums, Facebook groups etc devoted to this kind of subjects? I find it very interesting to discuss such matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Tishrei! I apologize for commenting once more on an old blog entry, but I&#8217;ve had some more thoughts on the subject which I don&#8217;t rightly know where else to post. </p>
<p>It seems to me that the reason why Calvin was so persistent in pushing the doctrines of predestination and total depravity was that the Roman Catholic Church of that era had trivialized the problem of sin by turning forgiveness into a commodity which could be bought and sold, primarily through indulgence peddling. Calvin and the other Protestant reformers were rightfully upset with this state of affairs and I believe that he, through his teachings, wanted to put the issue of sin in its proper perspective by emphasizing in the strongest possible terms that sin is worthy of punishment, that forgiveness is not a right and that it comes only through God&#8217;s grace. To invest one&#8217;s hopes of salvation in such a corrupt and hypocritical organization as the late-medieval RCC was both futile and preposterous, and the reformers were extremely aware of this.</p>
<p>The mistake that many modern Calvinists make, in my opinion, is that they often fail to have this historical perspective in mind. That&#8217;s why they often over-emphasize the doom-and-gloom aspect of the relationship between God and man, and fail to give the love, forgiveness and hope entailed in Christ&#8217;s teachings the attention it deserves (and which human beings so often need to be reminded of).</p>
<p>I wonder if you could please direct me to any forums, Facebook groups etc devoted to this kind of subjects? I find it very interesting to discuss such matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tishrei</title>
		<link>http://fruitoftheword.com/2009/04/05/calvinism-the-elect-and-children/comment-page-1/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator>Tishrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tishrei.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1424</guid>
		<description>Hi Jonas, I refer to myself as a monergist and your reason is one of the reasons I do so.  I would agree with you that Calvin would be horrified at what is taught under the banner of his name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jonas, I refer to myself as a monergist and your reason is one of the reasons I do so.  I would agree with you that Calvin would be horrified at what is taught under the banner of his name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas Liljestrom</title>
		<link>http://fruitoftheword.com/2009/04/05/calvinism-the-elect-and-children/comment-page-1/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Liljestrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tishrei.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>Your article is an excellent example of why I prefer to call myself Lutheran rather than Calvinist. When you devote too much thought to the issue of predestination and the elect/reprobate dichotomy, there is always a risk of plunging into misanthropy and becoming hardhearted and uncompassionate - characteristics which Christians are supposed to avoid, as far as my understanding goes.

From what I know of what Calvin himself taught, I infer that this was not his original intention - but it seems dangerously easy for some Calvinists to end up in that position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article is an excellent example of why I prefer to call myself Lutheran rather than Calvinist. When you devote too much thought to the issue of predestination and the elect/reprobate dichotomy, there is always a risk of plunging into misanthropy and becoming hardhearted and uncompassionate &#8211; characteristics which Christians are supposed to avoid, as far as my understanding goes.</p>
<p>From what I know of what Calvin himself taught, I infer that this was not his original intention &#8211; but it seems dangerously easy for some Calvinists to end up in that position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emmilglenn</title>
		<link>http://fruitoftheword.com/2009/04/05/calvinism-the-elect-and-children/comment-page-1/#comment-1147</link>
		<dc:creator>emmilglenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tishrei.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1147</guid>
		<description>Cool, I&#039;ll send you a link when I&#039;m done.  Have you looked at my expositions on 2 &#039;proof&#039; texts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, I&#8217;ll send you a link when I&#8217;m done.  Have you looked at my expositions on 2 &#8216;proof&#8217; texts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tishrei</title>
		<link>http://fruitoftheword.com/2009/04/05/calvinism-the-elect-and-children/comment-page-1/#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator>Tishrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tishrei.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1144</guid>
		<description>I shall look forward to your post :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shall look forward to your post <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emmilglenn</title>
		<link>http://fruitoftheword.com/2009/04/05/calvinism-the-elect-and-children/comment-page-1/#comment-1143</link>
		<dc:creator>emmilglenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tishrei.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1143</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I didn&#039;t mean to change it into a different topic, I just commented on your feelings of babies going to hell,  I&#039;ll write more on the topic as well. As you can see, I&#039;ve only covered 2 verses that can be used.  Maybe I&#039;ll write a post explaining the correct biblical view on it. So look out for it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I didn&#8217;t mean to change it into a different topic, I just commented on your feelings of babies going to hell,  I&#8217;ll write more on the topic as well. As you can see, I&#8217;ve only covered 2 verses that can be used.  Maybe I&#8217;ll write a post explaining the correct biblical view on it. So look out for it <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tishrei</title>
		<link>http://fruitoftheword.com/2009/04/05/calvinism-the-elect-and-children/comment-page-1/#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>Tishrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tishrei.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1141</guid>
		<description>Hi Glen, I just went and took a look at one of your links.  I am ready to head out the door so I did not have time to read it.  I&#039;ll comment over there on your blog :) when I do read it later today (hopefully).

As to hell, sure there&#039;s a hell.  It&#039;s all over the New Testament.  It&#039;s even a word in the New Testament.  But to be honest, I don&#039;t want this post to turn into a &quot;is there a hell or not&quot; debate.  I really would like to keep this thread/post on what I posted.  If other people are going to want to debate that on this thread, I&#039;ll just start a new post so not to take away from this one or you can leave your blog address so people can debate that with you :) 

I&#039;ll head over to your blog later today and leave my comments :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Glen, I just went and took a look at one of your links.  I am ready to head out the door so I did not have time to read it.  I&#8217;ll comment over there on your blog <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  when I do read it later today (hopefully).</p>
<p>As to hell, sure there&#8217;s a hell.  It&#8217;s all over the New Testament.  It&#8217;s even a word in the New Testament.  But to be honest, I don&#8217;t want this post to turn into a &#8220;is there a hell or not&#8221; debate.  I really would like to keep this thread/post on what I posted.  If other people are going to want to debate that on this thread, I&#8217;ll just start a new post so not to take away from this one or you can leave your blog address so people can debate that with you <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll head over to your blog later today and leave my comments <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://fruitoftheword.com/2009/04/05/calvinism-the-elect-and-children/comment-page-1/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tishrei.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1140</guid>
		<description>Tishrei,

I gotta make some points here.  You don&#039;t have to worry about Babies going to hell when they die.  Here&#039;s why:

1. God is love.  Babies haven&#039;t sinned (Rom 6:23) So they get the gift of God, which is eternal life given to us when Christ comes again.
2. There is no hell. 
http://wp.me/pFkoL-2p
http://wp.me/pFkoL-1O

Those teachings of aborted babies going straight to hell contradicts the very character of God, and his Word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tishrei,</p>
<p>I gotta make some points here.  You don&#8217;t have to worry about Babies going to hell when they die.  Here&#8217;s why:</p>
<p>1. God is love.  Babies haven&#8217;t sinned (Rom 6:23) So they get the gift of God, which is eternal life given to us when Christ comes again.<br />
2. There is no hell.<br />
<a href="http://wp.me/pFkoL-2p" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/pFkoL-2p</a><br />
<a href="http://wp.me/pFkoL-1O" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/pFkoL-1O</a></p>
<p>Those teachings of aborted babies going straight to hell contradicts the very character of God, and his Word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tishrei</title>
		<link>http://fruitoftheword.com/2009/04/05/calvinism-the-elect-and-children/comment-page-1/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Tishrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tishrei.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your very nice response.  I do agree with you that the person I cited was not a typical Calvinist.  I also understand that Calvin did not invent Reformed theology.  I do not like to refer to myself as following any one person and refer to myself as following a monergist theology.  I would not fit in the Reformed theology camp as I have not been convinced that certain doctrines that Reformed folks hold to are true such as baptism brings a child into the Christian covenant.  That being said, I do read a lot of literature and sermons from preachers of days gone by that are reformed of the reformed camp.  

The Calvinist that I did cite was cold and his words were chilling.  Even God said He does not take pleasure in the destruction of the wicked and this person was encouraging that we not only take pleasure but take pleasure that even children and infants were suffering in damnation. 

I do hope that anyone who reads my post reads down far enough to read your response.  Thank you for your response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your very nice response.  I do agree with you that the person I cited was not a typical Calvinist.  I also understand that Calvin did not invent Reformed theology.  I do not like to refer to myself as following any one person and refer to myself as following a monergist theology.  I would not fit in the Reformed theology camp as I have not been convinced that certain doctrines that Reformed folks hold to are true such as baptism brings a child into the Christian covenant.  That being said, I do read a lot of literature and sermons from preachers of days gone by that are reformed of the reformed camp.  </p>
<p>The Calvinist that I did cite was cold and his words were chilling.  Even God said He does not take pleasure in the destruction of the wicked and this person was encouraging that we not only take pleasure but take pleasure that even children and infants were suffering in damnation. </p>
<p>I do hope that anyone who reads my post reads down far enough to read your response.  Thank you for your response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Bell</title>
		<link>http://fruitoftheword.com/2009/04/05/calvinism-the-elect-and-children/comment-page-1/#comment-1138</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tishrei.wordpress.com/?p=278#comment-1138</guid>
		<description>Tishrei,

Thank you for an excellent and beautifully written article.  I found it most useful and enlightening!

Now, I would like to say this.  Please, please do not think that the person you cited is a typical &quot;Calvinist&quot;.  They most assuredly are not!

  I fought against Reformed Theology (aka Calvinism) tooth and nail for over 30 years.  When I first heard of it back in the mid 1970&#039;s, I thought it was the most evil thing I had ever heard of.  For all those years I read hundreds of articles  on both sides of the Arminian/Calvinism debate, along with scripture, searching for ways to disprove it.  I never could, but I could not accept it either.  Finally, last November (2008) I got fed up with the never ending struggle and told God to either convince me, or leave me alone!  Within two weeks, I was convinced, after God brought to mind all that I had read and studied and gently gave me understanding and acceptance of it.

For the first time in 30 years, when I read the Bible now, it is ALIVE!  Just as I&#039;d always heard it was but never experienced.  So much that was unclear and confusing became crystal!

I used to think I became a Christian in 1972, but now I believe I became one in November!

I used to hear people speak of the &quot;comfort&quot; and &quot;joy&quot; of Calvinism, and I thought they were off their rockers!  I could never conceive of those emotions coming from a believe in Calvinism.  I do now!  There is comfort, and joy, just like I heard there was, but refused to believe.

Your article is right on, and I don&#039;t have any problems fitting it into my current beliefs!  Thanks again for writing it.

A parting note to everyone: Please be aware that the word &quot;Calvinism&quot; is just a convenient handle to refer to Reformed Theology; and Reformed Theology is nothing more than the very Gospel itself as found in scripture.  It was not invented by John Calvin, or Martin Luther or Augustine and many folks believe.

Okay, a second parting note , John Calvin never heard of TULIP.  That acronym came into being after he had died.

Thanks for the opportunity to reply.

Cici</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tishrei,</p>
<p>Thank you for an excellent and beautifully written article.  I found it most useful and enlightening!</p>
<p>Now, I would like to say this.  Please, please do not think that the person you cited is a typical &#8220;Calvinist&#8221;.  They most assuredly are not!</p>
<p>  I fought against Reformed Theology (aka Calvinism) tooth and nail for over 30 years.  When I first heard of it back in the mid 1970&#8242;s, I thought it was the most evil thing I had ever heard of.  For all those years I read hundreds of articles  on both sides of the Arminian/Calvinism debate, along with scripture, searching for ways to disprove it.  I never could, but I could not accept it either.  Finally, last November (2008) I got fed up with the never ending struggle and told God to either convince me, or leave me alone!  Within two weeks, I was convinced, after God brought to mind all that I had read and studied and gently gave me understanding and acceptance of it.</p>
<p>For the first time in 30 years, when I read the Bible now, it is ALIVE!  Just as I&#8217;d always heard it was but never experienced.  So much that was unclear and confusing became crystal!</p>
<p>I used to think I became a Christian in 1972, but now I believe I became one in November!</p>
<p>I used to hear people speak of the &#8220;comfort&#8221; and &#8220;joy&#8221; of Calvinism, and I thought they were off their rockers!  I could never conceive of those emotions coming from a believe in Calvinism.  I do now!  There is comfort, and joy, just like I heard there was, but refused to believe.</p>
<p>Your article is right on, and I don&#8217;t have any problems fitting it into my current beliefs!  Thanks again for writing it.</p>
<p>A parting note to everyone: Please be aware that the word &#8220;Calvinism&#8221; is just a convenient handle to refer to Reformed Theology; and Reformed Theology is nothing more than the very Gospel itself as found in scripture.  It was not invented by John Calvin, or Martin Luther or Augustine and many folks believe.</p>
<p>Okay, a second parting note , John Calvin never heard of TULIP.  That acronym came into being after he had died.</p>
<p>Thanks for the opportunity to reply.</p>
<p>Cici</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
