web analytics
Skip to content

Abortion is nothing more than removal of clots – WOW

2009 August 27

I read a post on another community in response to abortion. The poster stated: “Abortion isn’t about killing babies, it’s about removing clots.” Here are my thoughts and views of “clots.”

Clots

At 7 weeks, a clot has a measurable brain wave and responds to touch. This clot took LESS than 2 months to develop a brain wave. By the time this clot has been hanging around for 8 weeks, it has recognizable organs. In LESS than 3 months, this clot has a distinguishable sex organ that can be visually seen with the naked eye. So it’s a boy clot or a girl clot. In 4 1/2 months, this clot has fingerprints that make it distinguishable from any other human being — well, not really a human but a clot, so we can distinguish this clot from any other clot by the clot’s own unique fingerprints. So it’s a clot with fingerprints, brain wave, arms, legs, ears, eyes and has a gender.

Remember, abortion is nothing more than removal of clots. So we’re removing clots at 8 weeks that can hear and by 12 weeks, the clot has an ability to feel pain because the clot has nerves and a spinal cord, the ability to make sound if the clot had air that could pass over the clot’s vocal cords. By 17 weeks, the clot is actually dreaming because it goes through REM sleep. I wonder what clots dream about. It’s a dreaming clot because at this stage, it could not sustain life outside the womb and again, it’s still nothing more than a clot.

The clot has REM sleep, will hiccup clot, can use its clot hands to grasp, has a clot heart beat that actually pumps clot blood, and even can recognize it’s mother’s voice.

I’m a clot. I have fingerprints, a gender, can recognize voices, have a heartbeat, I hiccup (well, I try not to), I have a spinal cord, I feel pain just like those clots. The difference between me and the mere clot is that I can survive outside a womb. It would be murder to take my life because I can survive outside the womb. But a clot is nothing more than a clot that can dream, feel pain, has its own blood, heartbeat, gender, and recognizes its mother’s voice. It just can’t survive outside of the womb.

Clots are like an annoying and unwanted pimple, we eradicate it. Wow!

Yours truly,
Self Sustaining Clot

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Related posts:

  1. Right to Choose
  2. Sin and Consequences
  3. What Is Truth?
  4. Tolerance
  5. I blame you
No Responses leave one →
  1. August 27, 2009

    None of my “clots” were ever removed. The three of them live here in this house, bringing life to our home and their world – spreading the blessings of God.

    On the other hand, I know people who have DIED because a real clot wasn’t removed from their body in time – one in the leg and another in the brain.

    How utterly different – one diagnosed clot bringing death, and another ‘diminished down to’ clot bringing life. What a TRAGIC mix up!

    • August 27, 2009

      Hi, so you have three little ‘clots’ running around? Certainly a blessing to you and your husband. I saw one of them on your blog — a very pretty young lady.

      In junior high, one of the students in my class had a clot in her brain. They were able to remove it but unfortunately, that left needing to be institutionalized for the rest of her life. I think about her sometimes this many years later. Very, very tragic.

      To call an unborn merely a ‘clot’ is necessary in order to justify to oneself the act unjustly taking a life. You have to come up with something to make it palatable to do such an act. Dehumanizing the unborn and calling it a ‘clot’ makes it easier to do what the vile deed.

      Blessings to you and your family. Hope your vacation was a great one!

  2. October 16, 2009

    The term “clot” is really in bad taste. It’s sheer inhuman to be so crude and blunt.

    I liked the elaborate scientific explanation. You are a very knowledgeable person Tishrei. How old are you?

    • October 16, 2009

      You are correct, clot is really in bad taste. I used it with purpose as that is what someone called it. My purpose was to point out that these are unborn children, not clots. To be perfectly honest, when someone said a child is not being aborted as it was not a child but merely a clot, that is when I wrote this blog post.

      Thanks for noticing.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS